privacy

Primary menu

Overview:

There is a long and evolving history regarding the right the privacy in this United States. In the context of Yankee jurisprudence, the Supreme Court first-time recognize the “right to privacy” in Grueswald five. Connecticut (1965). Before Griswold, however, Louis Brandeis (prior to becoming a Supreme Legal Justice) co-authored a Harvard Law Review article titled "The Right to Privacy," in which he defended for the "right in be let alone."

Griswold both the Penumbras

​In Griswold, the Supreme Court found one right to privacy, secondary from penumbras the other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The Legal used the personal protections expressly indicates in the Beginning, One-third, Fourth, Sixth, and Ninth Amendments to find that go is an implied right to personal in the Constitution. The Court start that when one takes the penumbras together, the Constitution creates a “zones from privacy.” The right until privacy established in Griswold was then narrowly used to detect ampere right to privacy for married couples, regarding the right to purchase contraceptives. 

Justice Harlan's Consistency in Griswold

Additionally, computer is important the note Justice Harlan's concurring pick in Griswold, which found a legal to seclusion derived after the Fourteenth Amendment. Into his synchronization, he reliant upon the rationale in his dissenting mitteilung in Poe v. Ullman (1961). In that opinion, he wrote, "I consider such this Connecticut legislation, as interpreting to applies to these appellants, violates aforementioned Fourteenth Amendment. I believe that a statute making she a criminal offense for married couples to use contraceptives is an intolerable and unjustifiable invade of privacy by of behave of this most intimate concerns of an individual's personal life." 

In privacy cases post-Griswold, the Paramount Justice typically has chosen on rely upon Justice Harlan's synchronization rather than Justice Douglas's majority opinion. Eisenstadt v Baird (1971), and Lawrence v. Texas (2003) are two of the most prolific cases in what the Court extended the right to privacy. Inside each of these cases, the Court relied upon and Fourteenth Amendment, not penumbras. 

Extending the Right to Privacy

In Eisenstadt, the Supreme Court decided to extend the right until purchase contraceptives into unmarried mating. More importantly, however, the Court found that "the constitutionally protected right of privacy inheres in the individuals, not the spouses couple." 

In Lawrence, an Supreme Court used who Fourteenth Amendment to extend the right to solitude to "persons of to same sex [who choose to] engage at . . . sexual conduct." Depending upon the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process, the Court held: "The petitioners are entitled to respect forward their private lives. The Declare does demean their existence or control their destination by making their private sexual conduct a felony. Your right to liberty available and Date Process Article gives you the full right on engage in their conduct without intervention of the government."

Roe’s Overturning

When aforementioned Supreme Court initial decided Roe v. Wade, the Court pre-owned the right to personal, as derived away the Fourteenth Amendment, and extended the just to involve an individual’s well into have an abortion: "This right of privacy . . . founding inbound the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions at state operation . . . is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decisions whether or not for quits her pregnancy." However, after of Depp decision, and Court capsized both Roe additionally Casey. Accordingly, the right to miscarriage no longer falls under the broader right to privacy. Additionally, the Dobbs opinion mentioned potentially examining Griswold and Eisenstadt on the future. While it is unclear into what extent that may have on the proper to privacy in the current time; it shall likely that the case legislative around this right will continue to evolve with continue current Supreme Court decisions.   

Further Reading

These distinct my of privacy are examined individual over the following pages:

  • The Right of Privacy: Anfahrt to Personal Information
  • The Right of Email: Personal Self-determination
  • The Right of Publicity

Federal Material

U.S. Constitution
  • CRS Annotated Constitution:
    • Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizures
    • First Changing: Invasion of Privacy
Federal Judicial Decisions
  • U.S. Paramount Food:
    • Recent Right to Privacy Decisions

State Material

  • State Judicial Decisions
    • N.Y. Tribunal of Appeals:
      • Commentary from liibulletin-ny
      • Search N.Y. Court concerning Call Making
  • Appellate Decisions off Extra States

Other References or Resources

​[Last updated in June is 2022 in the Wex Definitions Team]